Choose a small number of measurable objectives
Objectives should describe observable performance. “Test the drone” is too broad. Better objectives measure whether the correct person can request the resource, whether the team receives a defined assignment, whether air and ground hazards are communicated, whether command receives a finding through the intended channel, and whether records are transferred correctly.
A first exercise can remain narrow. It is better to verify five connected actions than to stage a large scenario that produces no clear evidence about what worked.
- Activation and acknowledgment time
- Arrival/check-in and supervisor assignment
- Aviation and scene-risk briefing
- Primary and backup communications
- Finding handoff and ground verification
- Data transfer and account closure
Exercise the information path
Create a simulated observation that must travel from the sensor or pilot to the assigned supervisor and then to a ground verification resource. Record how the observation was described, located, time-stamped, acknowledged, and resolved. Avoid treating an unverified image as a confirmed finding.
If remote viewing is part of the plan, authorize specific exercise viewers and verify that the feed supplements the radio or phone path. Include a viewer who is not on the pilot site so the exercise tests the actual remote workflow.
Force a connectivity failure
Temporarily remove or degrade the video path and observe whether the operation continues safely. The viewer should receive a clear degraded/offline indication, urgent communications should remain available, and the team should know whether to continue, change quality, reconnect, or stop sharing.
A second-window map, satellite connection, or cellular backup is useful only if the handoff and reconnection behavior has been tested. Document the equipment, settings, and network conditions used during the exercise.
Close with records and corrective actions
End the exercise by transferring the intended files, revoking temporary viewer access, accounting for equipment, and recording any unresolved information-handling issue. The after-action review should assign an owner and target condition for every corrective action.
Repeat only the failed or uncertain portions before expanding the scenario. A short corrective exercise often provides more value than waiting for the next annual full-scale event.
- What was expected?
- What occurred?
- What evidence supports the finding?
- What risk or delay resulted?
- Who owns the correction?
- How and when will it be retested?
Questions agencies ask
Frequently asked questions
Does the first exercise need to include a live aircraft?
No. A tabletop can test request authority, assignment language, communications, remote-access decisions, data handling, and go/no-go scenarios before a field flight.
What is the most important failure to simulate?
Loss of the live-viewing connection is valuable because it tests whether urgent information still moves through the established operational communications path.
Should exercise access credentials be reused for real incidents?
No. Use exercise-specific access and revoke it afterward. Operational access should be issued for the specific assignment and authorized viewers.
Related planning resources
Continue within agency integration and exercises
These resources address the next decisions agencies commonly evaluate within the same planning area.
Fire service planning
Planning Supplemental UAS Support for a Fire Department
A practical planning framework for fire departments evaluating supplemental drone support, including incident command, assignments, thermal limitations, communications, and data handling.
Read the related resourceAgency integration
Integrating an Outside UAS Resource into an Incident or Mutual-Aid Plan
A planning checklist for agencies integrating nonprofit, contracted, or mutual-aid UAS resources into incident command, communications, airspace coordination, and data handling.
Read the related resourceRegional planning
Public-Safety UAS Support Planning in Western Washington
Regional considerations for fire, search, emergency-management, and disaster-response organizations evaluating supplemental UAS support in Western Washington.
Read the related resourcePlanning references
Authoritative sources used for this resource
These references support the planning framework. Agencies and operators should still apply current law, authorization, policy, incident direction, and location-specific requirements.
Apply the framework to your organization
Discuss the assignment types, operating limits, communications, remote access, deliverables, and participation structure that fit your agency.